I haven't looked closely but HONESTLY on my computer it looks BRIGHT GREEN...too bright for my eyes. I prefer either a really dark backgound for contrast or something a bit more easy on the eyes.:-(.
I thought so, too, but wasn't sure if it was just my color setup. It is definitely a vivid green.catlady said:I haven't looked closely but HONESTLY on my computer it looks BRIGHT GREEN...too bright for my eyes. I prefer either a really dark backgound for contrast or something a bit more easy on the eyes.:-(
I stand corrected..yes, it should just be incorporated into the site. THough some folks don't know how to do that..so I think opening in a new window is less of a hassle than back trackingCatlady suggested the availability calendar opening in a new window. I don't recommend that for something that is supposed to be a part of your own site. A cleaner approach is to work with webervations to have the navigation from your site reproduced identically on webervations. That way they see it as a part of your site, rather than some frankenstein like add-on. I would not do that until you get your "template" just the way you want it.
Two other technical things if you can:
.
- Have your "home" link point to your root rather than index.htm
- Set up your hosting so that the non-www version of your site re-writes to the www version. (meaning that if you type in yourdomain.com that what appears in the address window becomes www.yourdomain.com)
Wow!!!ProudTexan said:The website is launched!
I've been working hard to debug the thing. I'm on a Mac and don't have access to Internet Explorer, so I would appreciate input from users of that browser. It looks and works great on Firefox, Mozilla, Netscape, Opera, OmniWeb and on the very old Mac IE (though it doesn't seem to recognize CSS).
No need to stand correctedI stand corrected..yes, it should just be incorporated into the site. THough some folks don't know how to do that..so I think opening in a new window is less of a hassle than back trackingCatlady suggested the availability calendar opening in a new window. I don't recommend that for something that is supposed to be a part of your own site. A cleaner approach is to work with webervations to have the navigation from your site reproduced identically on webervations. That way they see it as a part of your site, rather than some frankenstein like add-on. I would not do that until you get your "template" just the way you want it.
Two other technical things if you can:
.
- Have your "home" link point to your root rather than index.htm
- Set up your hosting so that the non-www version of your site re-writes to the www version. (meaning that if you type in yourdomain.com that what appears in the address window becomes www.yourdomain.com)
I guess that bright green just threw me for a loop
.
Since my navigation buttons are all done with CSS, I was wondering if I couldn't just include the <DIV> tags in the header along with the an embedded style sheet onto the Webervations page. However, I'm not sure if it's kosher to put a style sheet within the body of an HTML page.No need to stand correctedI stand corrected..yes, it should just be incorporated into the site. THough some folks don't know how to do that..so I think opening in a new window is less of a hassle than back trackingCatlady suggested the availability calendar opening in a new window. I don't recommend that for something that is supposed to be a part of your own site. A cleaner approach is to work with webervations to have the navigation from your site reproduced identically on webervations. That way they see it as a part of your site, rather than some frankenstein like add-on. I would not do that until you get your "template" just the way you want it.
Two other technical things if you can:
.
- Have your "home" link point to your root rather than index.htm
- Set up your hosting so that the non-www version of your site re-writes to the www version. (meaning that if you type in yourdomain.com that what appears in the address window becomes www.yourdomain.com)
I guess that bright green just threw me for a loop
.Yours was a good suggestion for the way it is set up now. Most designs can fit into webervations fairly easily, but sometimes not being able to control the width of webervations can give trouble when trying to fit in a side navigation like OakCreek is using.
.
And, they do charge you a one time fee for these additional images.They way to do it is to email them the stylesheet and images for your header and let them attach it in the header. The images have to go to them so they are served up by the secure server, otherwise people will get an error saying there is a security issue (which their isn't, but they don't know that). People are funny about not giving their info if they get a security warning. Once webervations lets you know the images and stylesheet are in place, then you can add your html to the custom headers and footers in your webervations account.
You can use inline styles within the body and you can specify mouse states in an inline style within a div, but since you have to send them the images anyway, you might as well use your own stylesheet..
That part is kind of stupid, it would be so easy for them to built that into the system where you could upload your own images and stylesheet, it would save them a ton of work and make it easier on us designers to boot.And, they do charge you a one time fee for these additional images.They way to do it is to email them the stylesheet and images for your header and let them attach it in the header. The images have to go to them so they are served up by the secure server, otherwise people will get an error saying there is a security issue (which their isn't, but they don't know that). People are funny about not giving their info if they get a security warning. Once webervations lets you know the images and stylesheet are in place, then you can add your html to the custom headers and footers in your webervations account.
You can use inline styles within the body and you can specify mouse states in an inline style within a div, but since you have to send them the images anyway, you might as well use your own stylesheet..
.
That makes absolutely no sense. There are three .PNG files that make up the logo. They're sitting inside a single cell of a table that isn't nested.In firefox I can see the 'slices' loading. In IE it still doesn't show. It looks like what I posted earlier.I'm not sure what's going on with I.E. It obviously doesn't like my table. I've done web authoring before without these kinds of results. The logo should be loading faster now. I took it through Adobe ImageReady and sliced into thirds greatly reducing it's size.OK, here's the firefox version. The other reply is from IE...
.
.
.
I notice you 'borrowed' my dietary restrictions paragraph word for word. Hope it works better for you than it does for me!
More pix of the cottages are needed. Interior and exterior. I'd want to know how close they are to each other and where they sit on the property. I would remove the twirly bits by the 'last minute specials' (only because I don't like twirly bits).
The picture gallery is a nice touch..
Yes I admit it. I'm flagrant plagiarist. Please excuse me, I should have asked.Bree said:I notice you 'borrowed' my dietary restrictions paragraph word for word. Hope it works better for you than it does for me!
Enter your email address to join:
Enter your email address to join:
Register today and take advantage of membership benefits.
Enter your email address to join: