I Have a home that I would like to turn it into a Inn or B&B, but I own another home that I live in, in the next town over. I can be there for Breakfast and great guest, and probably could stay there when quest arrive. My town zoning states you don't have to live there, but to hire a innkeeper.It all depends on your location and zoning regulations. In our town for example, zoning code states owner must live in the residence. There are many who don't live on site. I personally like someone being there...afterall the interaction with guests is the big part of why people choose a B & B stay..
What about when their plane gets in after midnight? Or they stop for dinner on the way? Check ins are often late and sometimes very late. Living the next town over would be difficult to manage.I Have a home that I would like to turn it into a Inn or B&B, but I own another home that I live in, in the next town over. I can be there for Breakfast and great guest, and probably could stay there when quest arrive. My town zoning states you don't have to live there, but to hire a innkeeper.It all depends on your location and zoning regulations. In our town for example, zoning code states owner must live in the residence. There are many who don't live on site. I personally like someone being there...afterall the interaction with guests is the big part of why people choose a B & B stay..
.
Fed requirements for ADA (disabilities act). 5 or fewer guest rooms, owner occupied and I think single building not subject to ADA. Otherwise, you need full accessibility. Such as ADA bathrooms, perhaps elevator, handicap ramps and other things.I Have a home that I would like to turn it into a Inn or B&B, but I own another home that I live in, in the next town over. I can be there for Breakfast and great guest, and probably could stay there when quest arrive. My town zoning states you don't have to live there, but to hire a innkeeper.It all depends on your location and zoning regulations. In our town for example, zoning code states owner must live in the residence. There are many who don't live on site. I personally like someone being there...afterall the interaction with guests is the big part of why people choose a B & B stay..
.
People absolutely prefer to have the owners there. It's part of the experience..
I would not agree with that absolute statement. Some people could care less if the owners are onsite as long as the staff is competent and helpful. I used to go to a 3-room B&B in Key West for years and never once met the owners. It's still one of my favorite places and I was unhappy when it sold as a private residence. Other B&Bs, especially larger ones, you will only meet the staff - if they are competent and personable, I'm okay with that.TheBeachHouse said:People absolutely prefer to have the owners there. It's part of the experience.
Again, not every innkeeper, even those who live on site, stays up or is always on property to check in every guest. Lots of us use self check-ins - some do that as a matter of course for all their guests.TheBeachHouse said:What about when their plane gets in after midnight? Or they stop for dinner on the way? Check ins are often late and sometimes very late. Living the next town over would be difficult to manage.
The problems I had with a rental property 45 minutes away. And that was just occasional issues. I sometimes sat for hours waiting to collect rent, prospects not show up, maintenance issues but they changed the lock... Cannot fathom trying to do something that needs as much effort as a B&B from a distance, unless as said elsewhere, you have good staff in place.What about when their plane gets in after midnight? Or they stop for dinner on the way? Check ins are often late and sometimes very late. Living the next town over would be difficult to manage.I Have a home that I would like to turn it into a Inn or B&B, but I own another home that I live in, in the next town over. I can be there for Breakfast and great guest, and probably could stay there when quest arrive. My town zoning states you don't have to live there, but to hire a innkeeper.It all depends on your location and zoning regulations. In our town for example, zoning code states owner must live in the residence. There are many who don't live on site. I personally like someone being there...afterall the interaction with guests is the big part of why people choose a B & B stay..
.
.
The problems I had with a rental property 45 minutes away. And that was just occasional issues. I sometimes sat for hours waiting to collect rent, prospects not show up, maintenance issues but they changed the lock... Cannot fathom trying to do something that needs as much effort as a B&B from a distance, unless as said elsewhere, you have good staff in place.What about when their plane gets in after midnight? Or they stop for dinner on the way? Check ins are often late and sometimes very late. Living the next town over would be difficult to manage.I Have a home that I would like to turn it into a Inn or B&B, but I own another home that I live in, in the next town over. I can be there for Breakfast and great guest, and probably could stay there when quest arrive. My town zoning states you don't have to live there, but to hire a innkeeper.It all depends on your location and zoning regulations. In our town for example, zoning code states owner must live in the residence. There are many who don't live on site. I personally like someone being there...afterall the interaction with guests is the big part of why people choose a B & B stay..
.
.
.
It would not be the way I personally would choose to run a B&B, but I can name at least a half a dozen that I have personal experience with the owner not being onsite, ranging from 3 room B&Bs to 8 room B&Bs to some bigger, almost boutique hotels. All of them get unfailingly good reviews on the staff and customer service from guests. It can be done - it takes more skill at hiring and managing staff.undersea said:Cannot fathom trying to do something that needs as much effort as a B&B from a distance, unless as said elsewhere, you have good staff in place.
Again, not every innkeeper, even those who live on site, stays up or is always on property to check in every guest. Lots of us use self check-ins - some do that as a matter of course for all their guests.TheBeachHouse said:What about when their plane gets in after midnight? Or they stop for dinner on the way? Check ins are often late and sometimes very late. Living the next town over would be difficult to manage.
There are lots of ways to run a B&B remotely - I think it is safe to say that they are more challenging to staff and establish..
We use self check ins too, but what if there is a problem? I can see living in the back yard, or two doors down, but the next town over? I guess it could work, but I wouldn't call it a B&B, maybe cottages or studios. It may just be perception, but in my experience, people choose a B&B for the hospitality. They choose an apartment for the autonomy.muirford said:Again, not every innkeeper, even those who live on site, stays up or is always on property to check in every guest. Lots of us use self check-ins - some do that as a matter of course for all their guests.TheBeachHouse said:What about when their plane gets in after midnight? Or they stop for dinner on the way? Check ins are often late and sometimes very late. Living the next town over would be difficult to manage.
There are lots of ways to run a B&B remotely - I think it is safe to say that they are more challenging to staff and establish.
Again, not every innkeeper, even those who live on site, stays up or is always on property to check in every guest. Lots of us use self check-ins - some do that as a matter of course for all their guests.TheBeachHouse said:What about when their plane gets in after midnight? Or they stop for dinner on the way? Check ins are often late and sometimes very late. Living the next town over would be difficult to manage.
There are lots of ways to run a B&B remotely - I think it is safe to say that they are more challenging to staff and establish..We use self check ins too, but what if there is a problem? I can see living in the back yard, or two doors down, but the next town over? I guess it could work, but I wouldn't call it a B&B, maybe cottages or studios. It may just be perception, but in my experience, people choose a B&B for the hospitality. They choose an apartment for the autonomy.muirford said:Again, not every innkeeper, even those who live on site, stays up or is always on property to check in every guest. Lots of us use self check-ins - some do that as a matter of course for all their guests.TheBeachHouse said:What about when their plane gets in after midnight? Or they stop for dinner on the way? Check ins are often late and sometimes very late. Living the next town over would be difficult to manage.
There are lots of ways to run a B&B remotely - I think it is safe to say that they are more challenging to staff and establish.
.
I don't want to mix the two issues up - no matter what, if there are people on site, I assume there is an emergency contact number that goes to someone who can help, and quickly. Maybe it's the owner, maybe it's the night manager.TheBeachHouse said:We use self check ins too, but what if there is a problem? I guess it could work, but I wouldn't call it a B&B, maybe cottages or studios
I think that is your perception. You've seen that many B&B owners here aren't really interested in the chitchat when they travel personally - maybe they choose a VRBO or hotel, but maybe they choose a bigger B&B with staff, or one that has cottages or very private units that also provide autonomy. I love a B&B in an historic building but I can be very satisfied in that aspect and still have privacy and only the interaction that I choose with other guests or staff.TheBeachHouse said:. It may just be perception, but in my experience, people choose a B&B for the hospitality. They choose an apartment for the autonomy.
Thanks everyone . It would be a 3 bedroom, 3 bath.. ..It's in a historic village, in a great spot, but I guess it wouldn't work out.The problems I had with a rental property 45 minutes away. And that was just occasional issues. I sometimes sat for hours waiting to collect rent, prospects not show up, maintenance issues but they changed the lock... Cannot fathom trying to do something that needs as much effort as a B&B from a distance, unless as said elsewhere, you have good staff in place.What about when their plane gets in after midnight? Or they stop for dinner on the way? Check ins are often late and sometimes very late. Living the next town over would be difficult to manage.I Have a home that I would like to turn it into a Inn or B&B, but I own another home that I live in, in the next town over. I can be there for Breakfast and great guest, and probably could stay there when quest arrive. My town zoning states you don't have to live there, but to hire a innkeeper.It all depends on your location and zoning regulations. In our town for example, zoning code states owner must live in the residence. There are many who don't live on site. I personally like someone being there...afterall the interaction with guests is the big part of why people choose a B & B stay..
.
.
.It would not be the way I personally would choose to run a B&B, but I can name at least a half a dozen that I have personal experience with the owner not being onsite, ranging from 3 room B&Bs to 8 room B&Bs to some bigger, almost boutique hotels. All of them get unfailingly good reviews on the staff and customer service from guests. It can be done - it takes more skill at hiring and managing staff.undersea said:Cannot fathom trying to do something that needs as much effort as a B&B from a distance, unless as said elsewhere, you have good staff in place.
.
People absolutely prefer to have the owners there. It's part of the experience..I would not agree with that absolute statement. Some people could care less if the owners are onsite as long as the staff is competent and helpful. I used to go to a 3-room B&B in Key West for years and never once met the owners. It's still one of my favorite places and I was unhappy when it sold as a private residence. Other B&Bs, especially larger ones, you will only meet the staff - if they are competent and personable, I'm okay with that.TheBeachHouse said:People absolutely prefer to have the owners there. It's part of the experience.
.
i should have said manager or greeter. Owner, staff. Point is someone needs to be there.muirford said:I would not agree with that absolute statement. Some people could care less if the owners are onsite as long as the staff is competent and helpful. I used to go to a 3-room B&B in Key West for years and never once met the owners. It's still one of my favorite places and I was unhappy when it sold as a private residence. Other B&Bs, especially larger ones, you will only meet the staff - if they are competent and personable, I'm okay with that.TheBeachHouse said:People absolutely prefer to have the owners there. It's part of the experience.
Thanks everyone . It would be a 3 bedroom, 3 bath.. ..It's in a historic village, in a great spot, but I guess it wouldn't work out.The problems I had with a rental property 45 minutes away. And that was just occasional issues. I sometimes sat for hours waiting to collect rent, prospects not show up, maintenance issues but they changed the lock... Cannot fathom trying to do something that needs as much effort as a B&B from a distance, unless as said elsewhere, you have good staff in place.What about when their plane gets in after midnight? Or they stop for dinner on the way? Check ins are often late and sometimes very late. Living the next town over would be difficult to manage.I Have a home that I would like to turn it into a Inn or B&B, but I own another home that I live in, in the next town over. I can be there for Breakfast and great guest, and probably could stay there when quest arrive. My town zoning states you don't have to live there, but to hire a innkeeper.It all depends on your location and zoning regulations. In our town for example, zoning code states owner must live in the residence. There are many who don't live on site. I personally like someone being there...afterall the interaction with guests is the big part of why people choose a B & B stay..
.
.
.It would not be the way I personally would choose to run a B&B, but I can name at least a half a dozen that I have personal experience with the owner not being onsite, ranging from 3 room B&Bs to 8 room B&Bs to some bigger, almost boutique hotels. All of them get unfailingly good reviews on the staff and customer service from guests. It can be done - it takes more skill at hiring and managing staff.undersea said:Cannot fathom trying to do something that needs as much effort as a B&B from a distance, unless as said elsewhere, you have good staff in place.
.
.
I have worked at a B&B (for about six months) where the owner was not on-site but there was a resident innkeeper (me & DH). It can work out, but you might be hard pressed to make it work with only 3 rooms. You would need a private room for the innkeeper, too. If zoning allows, an unhosted vacation rental might work, but you should make sure the rules are already in place. We've had two places shut down in our town for unhosted rentals.Wanda805 said:Thanks everyone . It would be a 3 bedroom, 3 bath.. ..It's in a historic village, in a great spot, but I guess it wouldn't work out.
Again, not every innkeeper, even those who live on site, stays up or is always on property to check in every guest. Lots of us use self check-ins - some do that as a matter of course for all their guests.TheBeachHouse said:What about when their plane gets in after midnight? Or they stop for dinner on the way? Check ins are often late and sometimes very late. Living the next town over would be difficult to manage.
There are lots of ways to run a B&B remotely - I think it is safe to say that they are more challenging to staff and establish..We use self check ins too, but what if there is a problem? I can see living in the back yard, or two doors down, but the next town over? I guess it could work, but I wouldn't call it a B&B, maybe cottages or studios. It may just be perception, but in my experience, people choose a B&B for the hospitality. They choose an apartment for the autonomy.muirford said:Again, not every innkeeper, even those who live on site, stays up or is always on property to check in every guest. Lots of us use self check-ins - some do that as a matter of course for all their guests.TheBeachHouse said:What about when their plane gets in after midnight? Or they stop for dinner on the way? Check ins are often late and sometimes very late. Living the next town over would be difficult to manage.
There are lots of ways to run a B&B remotely - I think it is safe to say that they are more challenging to staff and establish.
.I don't want to mix the two issues up - no matter what, if there are people on site, I assume there is an emergency contact number that goes to someone who can help, and quickly. Maybe it's the owner, maybe it's the night manager.TheBeachHouse said:We use self check ins too, but what if there is a problem? I guess it could work, but I wouldn't call it a B&B, maybe cottages or studios
I think that is your perception. You've seen that many B&B owners here aren't really interested in the chitchat when they travel personally - maybe they choose a VRBO or hotel, but maybe they choose a bigger B&B with staff, or one that has cottages or very private units that also provide autonomy. I love a B&B in an historic building but I can be very satisfied in that aspect and still have privacy and only the interaction that I choose with other guests or staff.TheBeachHouse said:. It may just be perception, but in my experience, people choose a B&B for the hospitality. They choose an apartment for the autonomy.
We go around and around on here on what's a B&B and what's not - there are some industry definitions out there, but what you will find is that B&Bs are as pretty individual. You are operating with a very narrow definition of a B&B, and your mileage may vary from others.
.
Do not think I agree - I think far and away, more people going to a B&B expect to have the owners around. Per Wikipedia: "Typically, bed and breakfasts are family homes or private homes offering acommodations."muirford said:I think that is your perception. You've seen that many B&B owners here aren't really interested in the chitchat when they travel personally - maybe they choose a VRBO or hotel, but maybe they choose a bigger B&B with staff, or one that has cottages or very private units that also provide autonomy. I love a B&B in an historic building but I can be very satisfied in that aspect and still have privacy and only the interaction that I choose with other guests or staff.
Thank you! .There are many B&Bs and Inns where the innkeeper lives next door that are very successful. We are completing a little house just behind our B&B that we're moving into and turning our bedroom into another guest room - we get privacy and make more money, win/win. We will be here as we typically are for breakfast and guest checkins. We will, however, "go home" about 9pm each night. There will be an emergency phone for guests to call over to our house - literally, I can be in the B&B in less than one minute if something comes up. We know several very successful innkeepers who recommended this because you need your own space and need to maximize the income potential from the B&B building. I'm not sure about living in another town however. I wouldn't do it unless I had a live-in assistant who slept over. Good luck..